The Audience of Fun Home
It’s a complex read, not only in its references and
word choice but also in its themes. I almost felt like I wasn’t qualified to
read this novel -- I hadn’t had enough English classes or read enough classic
novels to truly understand the message Bechdel was trying to send. I felt
ostracized as a reader and silly for even attempting to understand the novel.
In a book where so much is open-ended and up for interpretation, I struggled to
even understand the facts laid out on the page.
While reading, I found myself often wondering who this
novel was written for. So many popular coming-of-age stories have a clear
sequence of events with an ending where the conflicts in the story are
resolved. It not only allows readers to identify with a character but also to see
that character get a happy ending. Fun Home doesn’t have a linear
sequence of events and has no real conclusion. It seems like it’s written less
with the audience in mind and more to help the author work through the things
that have happened in her own life. In both of the previous books, I could
relate to things the characters did or said, but with Fun Home, I felt
like an outside observer. Bechdel did not offer any real conclusion for her
story and even after using this book as a tool to reflect, she doesn’t have a
real answer for everything that’s happened to her.
My lack of understanding of Fun Home made me
feel as if I was not the target audience. With all of Bechdel’s complex
language and references, it seems like she was writing this book for herself as
a way to try and understand her life story. Maybe it’s a bit self-centered to
think that because I didn’t understand a story no one did, but it’s hard to
ignore the fact that Bechdel doesn’t even fully understand her story and is
seeking to understand it in the same way we are. In that way, she seems to be
writing for herself more than another reader.
I definitely agree that the book probably would have resonated with me more if I had actually read more of the books that are referenced in this novel, just like you said. I like your idea that the book kind of served as Allison's diary where she can get down her thoughts and try to sort them out from there. In the same way that a diary contains hidden references or half-finished thoughts, Fun Home has many references to events or books that probably mean a lot more to Alison than they ever could to us. Like you pointed out, Fun Home has no nice conclusion or answers, but I think it's really interesting to see Alison work through her own story, and the fact that she can't find any concrete answers feels very realistic to me.
ReplyDeleteYeah I completely agree! Many times reading the novel I didn't really understand what she was talking about or what she was referencing. She seems very well-read, and readers could definitely have a better understanding of who she is and what she's saying by reading the things she references.
ReplyDeleteI absolutely agree that Fun Home felt like it was written for a very niche demographic - perhaps a literature savvy creative-minded teen. However, I don't think this target audience takes away from the experience of reading Fun Home as someone who doesn't really fit those traits, it arguably enhances it. Being able to picture myself in Bechdel's shoes with a completely different perspective than hers led me to be even more invested in her coming of age journey.
ReplyDeleteI agree with what you say about how the book seems like it's meant for Allison to work out her own issues. While it is technically written to be readable for people who don't know her or her family like explaining who everyone is and stuff, everything about it is so deeply personal and specific to her family, like the books that they read or even the plays that they watched together. It does sort of feel like the book exists more for the author than for any specific audience or anyone outside of the events that she is processing.
ReplyDeleteI completely agree with this assessment and I was having a lot of the same thoughts as you when reading this book. It felt really pretentious to me, but it was also really confusing because it's a graphic novel so it shouldn't be. I also totally agree that she was writing for the catharsis and closure rather than to make it a traditional story with a target audience.
ReplyDelete